Sunday, November 25, 2012

Which version of the American Dream do we pursue today? Biff's or Willy's?


I would say that in today’s society, people would follow a combination of the American Dreams of Biff and Willy. I say this because people are different so it would be very hard and weird to actually say all Americans follow one of these dreams. From my personal experience with American soil and some friends, I say that people tend to choose from these two dreams in order to make them their own. First of all, Biff’s version of the American Dream would be all about freedom and choosing whatever you like and being happy with that. On the other hand, Willy’s version of the American Dream was all about materialism and wealth coming from that.

If we were to analyze, then there would be a combination of this dreams where people would want to get wealthy by following whatever they like and not from one job that makes a lot of money. There is also the option of just going with Biff dream and follow whatever you like and then see if we choose the right path or not. In almost all occasions, the option that is chosen then would be the right path, as the person likes to do what he chose. Finally, when looking at Willy’s dream, there are people that just look at the wealth part because they want to be able to get money because money (in their minds) is the factor that determines who we are so if we have more, then we, at that point, start to feel happy.

I can conclude that people would tend to use a combination of these two dreams because the idea of just following the money was also related to the idea that parents would decide the life options for their kids. In today’s society, I don’t think that most societies follow that idea because every man and woman is free of choosing from options because they look at what is best for their own life. 

Friday, October 26, 2012

TV: Transmitting Knowledge



Believe or not, last October 8th, the Dr. Oz Show delivered an episode that severely impacted the lives of many people as he talked about one of the most important topics in this century: Artificial Sweeteners.
He started off by saying:
“Today I am talking about the choices you make every single day in your desire to get healthy. You cut out the butter and you cut out the sugar and you use healthy substitutes instead. Today I have brand new information. These butter and sugar alternatives may be linked to cancer, weight gain and even Alzheimer’s. Are you at risk?
Today you’ll get answers.”
These truly effective words catch the audience’s attention and engage them to keep watching that segment.
But first of all, why should we trust Dr. Oz?
He is a well-known doctor, who graduated from one of the most prestigious universities in USA, Harvard University. He received his MBA degree from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and was awarded the Captain’s Athletic Award in College for leadership having been class president and student body president during medical school.
After watching the episode online from doctoroz.com, I happened to look at the comments from Facebook left below the video, and realized that this video has reached the top 10 most commented videos.
In addition to compliments about Dr. Oz’s work, the comments in the video included questions concerning specific problems related with artificial sweeteners and daily consumption as well as the use of Stevia, since it was the main substance talked about in that section.

Dr. Oz specialty is general medicine, however to be more helpful to the audience he has special guests like in todays show, dietician, Ashley Koff, who participated as a topic consultant; her purpose consisted of helping educate people on the effects of Artificial Sweeteners and she suggested Stevia as the natural sweetener replacement. She also answered questions from an invited guest who talked about her own health problems regarding the consumptions of these chemicals.
The show’s incorporation of getting free consultation from a specialized doctor as well as the sharing of specific problems happens to make the show the most successful one on Mondays at 2 p.m.
This schedule makes it beneficial for the transmission of knowledge because it corresponds to the timing where mothers happen to be free after lunch and begin to watch TV. Thanks to their free time, this creates an effect because mothers are able to retain the information and then use it for the benefit of her family.
The idea of contacting people who suffer from diseases talked during the show and making them share their pains in public is very effective. The best help Dr. Oz Show can do is raise awareness, not only for the audience watching but also for the guests that come to the show to share their story. The best way to stop the problem is by acquiring greater knowledge on the illness.
Thanks to the fact that this show is televised it is able to reach a far greater amount of viewers than other medias. This creates two effects, which would be less expenditure of money from the viewers and a better transmission of knowledge.
The “Hands-on-Activities” and animations become great tools used during the program; they create a greater impact on the audience in the studio.
The “Hands-on-Activities” help transmit the idea of self-awareness of the problem in order to treat or cure it. This helps because once the root cause of the problem is known, and then precaution actions can take place to make the person take care of their body in order to cure their problem and not to experience any pain.
Dr. Oz makes use of animations in order to explain the disease to the guests who are dealing with it in an easier way.  Normally, when doctors explain the disease in their own jargon, it is very difficult to comprehend.
I encountered a similar experience last year. One day, all of a sudden I woke up with a pain in my right eye and I thought that I hit myself during my sleep. As time progressed the pain grew stronger every time I would touch it. I decided to venture to the doctor. While I was there he examined my eye and told me I had a Stye, since I’ve never experienced one before I didn’t know what it was.
While the doctor explained what it was, I zoned out. He was using technical terms to describe the infection as well as the treatment for it. I didn’t understand what he was saying, so when he said to just pour some drop into my eye, that’s what I took from it. As if my luck wasn’t bad enough, I got another Stye infection. Due to the fact that I zoned out while the doctor was speaking I had to go back again to his office and get another explanation. After that happened, I started to learn about my infection for future precautions.
Have you ever gone through this moment in your life?
Going back to the Artificial Sweeteners’ episode, I can personally say that this fragment had an impact on me; I suffer from high sugar in my blood, so I could relate to what Dr. Oz was saying. I was able to understand the problems that arise from the consumption of artificial sweetener and the effect they can have on my body and health in the long run.
 Can you relate to the problem of consuming Artificial Sweeteners?
I can honestly say that Dr. Oz has helped me in many of the problems I have experienced, as I am pretty sure it has helped many Americans. Thanks to media, dedicated people like Dr. Oz can expand their own support to communities and societies because they can share some knowledge at a much quicker pace. And that is what growth and evolution is all about.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Rough Draft Op-Ed

The Dr. Oz Show helps American Society Know about Healthy Choices for a Healthy Life
Dr. Oz episode on October 8 severely impacted the lives of many people as he talked about one of the most important topics in this century: Artificial Sweeteners.
He started off by saying:
“Today I am talking about the choices you make every single day in your desire to get healthy. You cut out the butter and you cut out the sugar and you use healthy substitutes instead. Today I have brand new information. This butter and sugar alternatives may be linked to cancer, weight gain and even Alzheimer’s. So are you at risk? Today you’ll get answers.”
Those are truly convincing words that catch the attention of the audience for them to see that episode.
After finishing looking at the episode online from doctoroz.com, I happened to look at the comments from Facebook left below the video, and found out that it was in the top 10 videos with most comments.
Most of the comments were about complements to the work done but also questions concerning specific problems about artificial sweeteners on daily basis. Another topic discuss on the comments was the use of Stevia because that was the main substance talked in the episode.
There was a helper, a dietician named Ashley Koff, which decided to help and educated most people on the effects of Artificial Sweeteners and a good replacement, Stevia.  She was able to answer questions of an invited guest, which talked about her problems.
That is great in my opinion!
Being able to contact people who suffer from those diseases and convince them to go to the show and share what they feel and talk about how they think this originated. The best help that the Dr. Oz Show tries to give would be self-awareness; trying to make them realize what’s the problem and how it was originated because it’s the only way to make them stop their problem as they were the ones who created it.
Another great tool that happens to make a great impact and helps the audience in the studio as well as the ones seeing the show would be the animations or the hands on activities. Animations are created by Dr. Oz in order to help him explain the problem because it has happened that many times the people who to the doctor come out not knowing what they have and they just nod in order to not take so much time and because some are lazy.
The hands on activities are activities that Dr. Oz creates for the invited guest to actually figure out and learn about the problem she or he is experiencing and be able to actually know about the problem and see how it is being formed. This helps because once the root cause of the problem is known, then precaution thoughts are being created and the person starts to take care of their body to not experience those problems or diseases.
That has happened to me this year. I woke up one day with a pain in my right eye and I thought that it had hit myself while I was sleeping so I stopped worrying. Every time I would scratch my eye it would hurt and each time it started to hurt more. I then decided to go to the doctor after school so that I could get checked and be able to know what I had in my right eye. Once I was inside the doctor’s office he examined me and started to tell me a name, Stye.
He then explained how it was formed and with some weird names inside the eye. Since I didn’t understand and I wanted to leave early, I just nodded and left because I had been given some drops and that would cure it. For my bad luck, after 3 months, the pain returned to my eye and because I didn’t pay attention to the doctor, I had to go back and once again get treatment but this time I started to learn about my problem.
That is why the animation and the hand on activities help the patient or invited guest that goes to the Dr. Oz Show as it helps know about the problem and how it is created. 
Going back to the episode about the Artificial Sweeteners, this episode actually had an impact on me because I suffer from sugar problems inside my blood. This episode was able to show me about the problems that arise from the consumption of artificial sweeteners and how they can affect my body and health in a longer term.
This episode as well as the other ones created by Dr. Oz, where he talks about current diseases and health problems actually help society, as it is free. That is the main purpose of the program; it is available to the American society so that they can learn about their own body without going to the doctor. It is all in that box that transmits pictures or in that portable machine that displays videos.
I honestly say that Dr. Oz has helped me in many of the problems that I had as well as in my family. I would be lost but also, I would have wasted a lot of money if Dr. Oz wouldn’t run these programs.
Dr. Oz is a great person for dedicating this amount of time to actually help American Society and I’m sure his show will keep being successful because it talks about problems in the American Society.

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Op-Ed Outline


 Introduction:
           
Start with an opening phrase from the Dr. Oz Show to catch the attention of the readers. Start explaining its importance In the American society and how it has revolutionized it during the last decade.  Talk about american’s health that has been affected throughout the last 2 decades by the quantity of junk food consumed.

Body:

Talk about how is health improving right now in the USA and use the facts from the research. Talk about how media is revolutionizing health and link it to the TV. Mention the Dr. Oz Show and its importance in the American society. Refer to the facts from the research. Finish by talking about it’s effect on the society and how media has changed health through the use of the Dr. Oz show.

Conclusion:

Conclude on how media is affecting society in a positive way. Through the uze of Dr. Oz Show, people are able to obtain the same knowledge about their own health situation and how to get a solution to their problem.   

Topic Research


Dr. Oz Show:
·
The one who runs the program is Mehmet Oz

· He is American and Turkish and he is a cardiothoracic surgeon, author and television personality

·  He started working on the The Oprah Winfrey Show in 2004

·  Harpo Productions and Sony Pictures started The Dr. Oz Show, a program that would focus on medical issues and personal health

· The show took over 80% of the time slots previously occupied by the Oprah Winfrey Show for season 3

      It airs in 10 different countries around the world like: Australia, Costa Rica, Slovenia, Croatia, Singapore, Malaysia, Poland, Arab world, Netherlands, Philippines and Slovakia

·The original run started on September 14, 2009 until now
·     
 The list of topics talked in the show are:
Addiction
Alternative Health
Anti-Aging
Cancer
Diet & Weight Loss
Eye Care
Fitness
Heart Health
Men’s Health
Nutrition
Oral Health
Sex and Relationships
Sleep
Smart Patient
Stress
Women’s Health



Improving Health in the United States:
  • ·      A book was created by the Committee on Health Impact Assessment and National Research Council
  • ·      Talks about decisions for a healthier life
  • ·      Talks about the major diseases happening right now
  • ·      Good nutrition for the population to follow
  • ·      USA is ranked 3rd in total expenditures on health care
  • ·      It is ranked 32nd in life expectancy
  • ·      Almost 50% of the American seniors suffer from chronic illness, obesity, and this affected children and adults
  • ·      Health is determined by the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age


Media helping health:
  • ·      It gives a greater knowledge
  • ·      In terms of the doctors, they are able to recognize and learn about the patient’s disease
  • ·      Great tool to figure out the correct terminology of the disease and how to treat it
  • ·      Around 61% of patients say they trust information posted by physicians on social media
  • ·      An example, Twitter helps the doctors post helpful information which is free and improves the health of the patient
  • ·      Everyone is connected with a social media so it is easy to follow a disease and see how it is affecting people around the world
  • ·      By creating a postivie online environment to help quit smoking
  • ·        For instance, New York City Department of Public Health’s Facebook Page, NYC Quits Smoking/I Quit has more than 5,000 fans and Florida Department of Health’s Twitter-based program, Qwitter, is not far behind


Op-Ed Research


OP-ED COLUMNIST

Don’t Mess With Big Bird

  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • E-MAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS
Mitt Romney’s Big Bird swipe during Wednesday’s debate raised some hackles: PBS’s, many on social media and mine.
Damon Winter/The New York Times
Charles M. Blow
Go to Columnist Page »

Campaign Stops

Campaign Stops
Read more from Charles M. Blow on the 2012 election.
Opinion Twitter Logo.

Connect With Us on Twitter

For Op-Ed, follow@nytopinion and to hear from the editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, follow@andyrNYT.

Readers’ Comments

Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
Romney told the debate moderator, Jim Lehrer:
“I’m sorry, Jim. I’m going to stop the subsidy to PBS. I’m going to stop other things. I like PBS. I love Big Bird. I actually like you, too. But I’m not going to — I’m not going to keep on spending money on things to borrow money from China to pay for it.”
Those are fighting words.
Social media, and others, exploded in Big Bird’s defense.
“Governor Romney does not understand the value the American people place on public broadcasting and the outstanding return on investment the system delivers to our nation. We think it is important to set the record straight and let the facts speak for themselves.”
Exactly! What they said!
Big Bird is the man. He’s 8 feet tall. He can sing and roller skate and ride a unicycle and dance. Can you do that, Mr. Romney? I’m not talking about your fox trot away from the facts. I’m talking about real dancing.
Since 1969, Big Bird has been the king of the block on “Sesame Street.” When I was a child, he and his friends taught me the alphabet and the colors and how to do simple math.
Do you know how to do simple math, Mr. Romney? Maybe you and the Countess Von Backward could exchange numbers.
Big Bird and his friends also showed me what it meant to resolve conflicts with kindness and accept people’s differences and look out for the less fortunate. Do you know anything about looking out for the less fortunate, Mr. Romney? Or do you think they’re all grouches scrounging around in trash cans?
I know that you told Fox News this week that you were “completely wrong” for making that now infamous 47 percent comment, but probably only after you realized that it was a drag on your poll numbers. Your initial response was to defend it as “inelegantly stated” but essentially correct. That’s not good, sir. Character matters. Big Bird wouldn’t have played it that way. Do you really believe that Pennsylvania Avenue is that far away from Sesame Street? It shouldn’t be.
Let me make it simple for you, Mr. Romney. I’m down with Big Bird. You pick on him, you answer to me.
And, for me, it’s bigger than Big Bird. It’s almost impossible to overstate how instrumental PBS has been in my development and instruction.
We were poor. My mother couldn’t afford day care, and I didn’t go to preschool. My great-uncle took care of me all day. I could watch one hour of television: PBS.
When I was preparing for college and took the ACT, there were harder reading passages toward the back of the test. Many had scientific themes — themes we hadn’t covered at my tiny high school in my rural town. But I could follow the passages’ meanings because I had watched innumerable nature shows on PBS.
I never went to art or design school. In college, I was an English major before switching to mass communications. Still, I went on to become the design director of The New York Times and the art director of National Geographic magazine.
That was, in part, because I had a natural gift for it (thanks mom and dad and whatever gods there may be), but it’s also because I spent endless hours watching art programs on PBS. (Bob Ross, with his awesome Afro, snow-capped mountains and “magic white,” will live on forever in my memory.)
I don’t really expect Mitt Romney to understand the value of something like PBS to people, like me, who grew up in poor, rural areas and went to small schools. These are places with no museums or preschools or after-school educational programs. There wasn’t money for travel or to pay tutors.
I honestly don’t know where I would be in the world without PBS.
As PBS pointed out:
“Over the course of a year, 91 percent of all U.S. television households tune in to their local PBS station. In fact, our service is watched by 81 percent of all children between the ages of 2-8. Each day, the American public receives an enduring and daily return on investment that is heard, seen, read and experienced in public media broadcasts, apps, podcasts and online — all for the cost of about $1.35 per person per year.”
PBS is a national treasure, and Big Bird is our golden — um, whatever kind of bird he is.
Hands off!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Matt Miller
Matt Miller
Opinion Writer

How Biden can win the vice presidential debate

Sorry, Democrats, but someone has to say it: Talking about what a “liar” Mitt Romney is may feel good right now, but if that’s what Joe Biden focuses on Thursday night, he’ll blow the vice presidential debate just as President Obama blew the first one.
No, if Biden wants to help the ticket make up for ground lost since the Denver debacle, he needs a different approach. An approach that doesn’t assume his listeners already agree with him. He needs to walk people through some political realities the way he’d explain them to a small roomful of independent or undecided voters.
Matt Miller
A senior fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund and co-host of public radio’s “Left, Right & Center,” Miller writes a weekly column for The Post.
“My friends,” Biden should say, “we can’t be sure at this point what Mitt Romney’s ‘real’ philosophy and values are. He governed Massachusetts as a centrist Republican and did things that I applaud — like enacting a universal health plan with the support of Ted Kennedy. That plan became a model for the president’s national reform.
“But then Governor Romney sold his soul to the right wing of his party to get the nomination – and adopted extreme conservative positions on taxes, immigration, health care, women’s rights and more.
“Did Romney call for well-off Americans to contribute nothing to deficit reduction — or for hard-working high school graduates to be deported, though they were brought here as children – or for millions of poor workers to be stripped of basic health coverage – because he really believes in this pinched vision of America? Or did he do it because he thought that’s what it took to win the nomination?
“I have no idea, my friends. And neither does anyone else.
“That’s the point. It’s impossible to know Mitt Romney’s real values. But it’s entirely possible to understand the conservative forces Romney has pandered to and empowered in his thirst for office. They’re the same extremists who will be calling the shots if you send him to the White House.
“The selection of Paul Ryan was part of Governor Romney’s strategy to court the right wing. The key thing I want to persuade you of tonight, then, is why Congressman Ryan’s values, and those of today’s congressional Republicans who stand with him, are out of step with America’s best traditions and current needs.
“Let me be clear: I’ve worked with Republicans over my entire 40-year career. You can’t accomplish anything in Washington if you don’t. But something a little crazy has gotten into the water the GOP has been drinking these last few years. Too many Republicans today won’t support the policies we need to renew America’s middle class and assure opportunity and security in a global age.
“Let me also stipulate that Paul is a hard-working young man and has a lovely family. My critique isn’t personal. But Paul is skilled at wrapping his ideas in a pleasant-sounding package that I’ll ask you to look beyond tonight.
“Here are three things you need to understand about my opponent and the congressional Republicans who share his views.
“First, on taxes: The single highest priority of Mr. Ryan and Republicans in Congress has been to cut taxes on America’s top earners — even though we’ve been at war for a decade and have huge deficits to shrink. This is the first time in our history that America has cut taxes for top earners at a time of war. Mitt Romney and congressional Republicans think we should let other people’s children fight our wars, and let other people’s children pick up the tab for them later. The president and I believe this is wrong.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Univision encuentros a win for Hispanic viewers

 

FSANTIAGO@MIAMIHERALD.COM

For two nights, the Univision presidential forum “ El gran encuentro” displaced the telenovela Amor bravĂ­o (Indomitable Love) set in a grand Mexican ranch that raises fiercely competitive bulls for the ring.
The Big Meet didn’t come close to bullfight status, but interviewers Jorge Ramos and Maria Elena Salinas, the anchors of Univision’s nightly news, gave no free passes — not even to a friendly president more popular than his challenger with the network’s national audience.
As a result, the winners were the country’s 50 million Hispanics, whose concerns — the economy and jobs but also immigration, health and education — were pointedly posed before the candidates.
Republican challenger Mitt Romney seemed relaxed and tanned, but nothing could save him from the 47 percent question. He fell short all night, choosing to answer questions with well rehearsed campaign-trail lines.
President Barack Obama, who is handily winning the Hispanic vote, strolled on set exuding confidence — too much of it, perhaps — but before he knew it, he had to buckle down to a serious grilling on his failure to deliver immigration reform.
“You promised that, and a promise is a promise, and with all due respect, you didn’t keep that promise,” Ramos said at one point. Salinas also delivered a reminder of that failure at the end of the interview.
Though neither candidate said anything news-breaking, their presence alone at a forum of this magnitude conducted in Spanish was significant and unprecedented, an important recognition of the country’s fastest-growing minority.
Add that both candidates underestimated Ramos and Salinas — journalism royalty to consumers of Spanish-language news and excellent interviewers — and it’s not a stretch to say that these forums will be remembered as historic.
The only off-note came when the Republican audience booed Ramos when he asked Romney about his comment in February that illegal immigrants would “self-deport.”
Obama was asked harder questions than Romney — about the threats to the U.S. embassy in Lybia and the role the U.S. should play to curtail the violence in Mexico — yet the largely Democratic crowd was better behaved. The only reaction visible to viewers was laughter when Obama acknowledged with humor that Ramos had made his point on his immigration-reform failure.
With these forums, another important point was made — to the Commission on Presidential Debates.
Univision set up the encuentros in response to the commission’s refusal to include Hispanic journalists among the moderators in upcoming debates. The commission also declined to allow Univision to host a debate.
But Ramos and Salinas, who speak English as well as any native and have interviewed leaders around the world, have earned their seats at the national table.
Almost as indomitable as the bulls at the fictional ranch La Mal Querida (The Unloved) Ramos and Salinas may have taught their colleagues a thing or two about inclusion.
The 23 million Hispanics eligible to vote in November are too important to ignore.